Becoming powerful is not the real success, but the real success is how you behave after gaining power, authority and power. This attitude determines your success or failure.
After gaining power, if you relax your attitude and spend all your energies in constructive activities, then not only your power leads the society on the path of welfare, but also leaves a positive impact on yourself. In terms of power, there can be groups of countries as well as individual individuals, institutions and countries.
See a simple example. The scumbag of any office awes the cylinds of their power. The little clerk runs his coin of power at the scumbag. The head clerk does not let the junior clerk breathe easy and Babu’s guns are directed at the head clerk. The superintendent (small manager, foreman, etc.) puts his authority on the head clerk, above him the scale of officers changes to directors and secretaries and ministers, while in corporate culture these links go to managers, general managers, directors or owners. Arrives. Whether it’s offices or companies, groups and countries that make power the center of their authority, everywhere you will find a bill on the forehead, increasing difficulties, stoppage of work, people suffering from psychological problems. On the contrary, where instead of being lost in the intoxication of power, the general attitude is to make power the center of welfare, the situation will be slightly better. By gaining power, the use of common sense is taken from ordinary people
In the objective conditions of Pakistan, every behavior goes from general behavior to politics in every situation. Today the topic of discussion is Imran Khan, Qasim Ali Shah and their meeting. The cannons of change are facing Qasim Ali Shah. The reason is that some of the words of this person were bad for the pioneers of change. The main thing in Pakistani society is that here we need daily bread more than motivation, we are more used to judging things on practical level rather than ideas or imagination and one’s self can be criticized when Hold yourself to the height of character. That is why the debate is futile whether it is Qasim Ali Shah or Nelson Mandela. After his arrest, Fawad Chaudhry is also comparing himself with Bhagat Singh and Nelson Mandela. Here we only mention Imran Khan and his power.
Nelson Mandela not only served a long imprisonment in South Africa but also gained power and came to power. But surprisingly in a society imprinted with slavery, their power was never used as revenge against anyone. As soon as he assumed power, his lenient attitude towards the white class was surprising. Perhaps this is why South Africa is thriving today. On the contrary, you should put Imran Khan’s personality in front. Twenty-two years of war ended on the ships of Tareen and Aleem. Full replacement players were brought in. Surprisingly, the whole process was called democratic and excellent. It was not an undemocratic attitude to bring in Azad Panchhi, but the way the ships were advertised made it certain that the story would start with the count and certainly end with the count. However, the power was found. But what happened after gaining this power?
The educated section of the Pakistani society was definitely in favor of the importance of taking the country on the path of development. It is important to stop the ways of corruption. Economically, it is important to take Pakistan forward. But no sir! Our twenty-two-year struggle was not to put Pakistan on the path of development, but our only goal was to gain power, for which we tried every tactic. Unlike the first speech, Imran Khan selectively sought people for revenge politics. It is definitely important whether it is Nawaz Sharif or Asif Zardari, fingers are raised, and will be raised as to how they have treated the country, but the need was to first strengthen the country and then get hands on the thieves as well. put Vavela was started, the posts were given to the people they liked, which was happening before. Economic team? Five million houses? A million jobs? The Asian Tiger? Place in the United Nations? Strong stance in controversial issues? All this would have happened when Imran Khan, after gaining power, would humbly make serving the country his motto. There was no clear plan of action and no direction to put the country on the path of development, so only one agenda remained: anger, anger.
And when nothing happened, foolish decisions were made. Instead of focusing on development, thought pawns were rushed towards political revenge. The blind people of the intellect have turned away from the fact that if you had led the country on the path of development for at least three years and then hanged the thieves on the gallows, you would have had a good name and a name in the international community. But the situation is that apart from a plastered leg, there is nothing to show in the election campaign. And compared to Apna Mahathir Mohamad and Nelson Mandela.
Immense public resources were poured into political vendettas and the status quo was that Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s helicopters continued to be used illegally and legislation had to be enacted to prevent this. Regularization of Bani Gala? Hey leave it sir! Was this the change? Was this success? That’s why the power was acquired? And the claims were just claims? Where are the classrooms in government buildings? Where is the success brought by the auction of buffaloes? Where are two hundred dams? Where has the revolution brought by the chicken policy gone? Where are millions of houses built? Where are the prized players these days? The performance of the present government is very bad. But does Imran Khan have any positive work to campaign against this government that he has done in his government? If so, then why is it not being used in the campaign against the government? There are many questions, the answers are not found.
Be it Quaid-e-Azam or Mahatma Gandhi, Martin Luther King or Mao Zedong, Nelson Mandela or Mahathir Muhammad, no one, when given the power, neither adopted an arrogant attitude nor held on to pride. The best example is that of Agha Du Jahan (peace be upon him) who announced amnesty after the conquest of Makkah. Were not the people of Makkah evil? They were absolutely. But by greatness of character he was brought to good. Imran Khan called for action against thieves, but did he stay away from this mess? The situation here is that the examples of the state of Madinah were given but in the real sense they were blessed in such a way that the stories that have started to unfold now, it is the decade that God saves from such a change.
